Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance on the cognitive tests at follow up based on kidney function at baseline

From: Processing speed is affected by early impairment in kidney function in the general elder population

Cognitive test

Cognitive domain

Mean result baseline

Mean result 6 year follow up

Mean change in test result from baseline to 6 year follow up

Mean difference in test result change between baseline and follow up (95 % CI) p–value

Participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

Participants with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

Participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

Participants with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

Participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

Participants with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 from baseline to follow up (n)

 

MMSE

Global

26.79 (192)

27.83 (708)

25.66 (184)

27.43 (701)

–1.13

–0.40

–0.11 (–0.61, 0.38) 0.66

Digit span forwards

Learning and memory

5.62 (194)

5.80 (708)

5.27 (195)

5.62 (708)

–0.35

–0.18

–0.04 (–0.28, 0.20) 0.75

Free recall

Learning and memory

6.55 (190)

7.64 (699)

5.67 (193)

7.28 (707)

–0.88

–0.36

0.13 (–0.37, 0.63) 0.62

Recognition

Learning and memory

11.73 (188)

12.43 (695)

10.82 (193)

12.15 (703)

–0.91

–0.28

–0.09 (–0.79, 0.61) 0.81

Word fluency

Language

11.38 (196)

13.56 (706)

10.87 (193)

13.42 (705)

–0.51

–0.14

0.05 (–0.68, 0.78) 0.89

Digit cancellation

Complex attention

15.82 (189)

18.68 (704)

15.06 (170)

18.82 (698)

–0.76

0.14

–0.30 (–0.96, 0.35) 0.36

Pattern comparison

Complex attention

23.61 (189)

30.45 (703)

21.46 (170)

30.03 (697)

–2.15

–0.42

–1.18 (–2.26, –0.09) 0.03

TMT Aa

Complex attention

16.53 s (183)

12.62 s (682)

18.79 s (165)

12.02 s (674)

2.26 s

–0.60 s

1.23 (–0.17, 2.62) 0.08

TMT Ba

Executive function

36.33 s (141)

25.37 s (628)

47.66 s (128)

26.23 s (621)

11.33 s

0.86 s

1.19 (–3.90, 6.28) 0.65

Digit span backwards

Executive function

4.02 (194)

4.38 (707)

3.82 (194)

4.26 (708)

–0.20

–0.12

–0.04 (–0.28, 0.21) 0.78

Mental rotationsb

Perceptual motor

0.57 (181)

0.65 (696)

0.56 (175)

0.61 (702)

–0.01

–0.04

0.02 (–0.03, 0.06) 0.52

Confidence judgementc

Meta–memory

0.09 (191)

0.11 (697)

0.09 (194)

0.10 (708)

0.00

–0.01

0.01 (–0.02, 0.03) 0.62

  1. Linear regression models were used to calculate the delta result for each cognitive test from baseline to follow up between the two eGFR groups
  2. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, level of education, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking habits at baseline
  3. Abbreviations: eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, CI confidence interval, n number, s seconds
  4. aThe time (in seconds) to complete the TMT A and the TMT B test was measured
  5. bIn mental rotations, the proportion of correct answers divided with the total number of answered questions was calculated
  6. c A calibration formula was used to calculate confidence. 0 means perfect confidence judgement. The bigger the value, the worse confidence judgement