Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of treatment in two groups: ascending-descending profile and routine

From: The effect of ascending- descending ultrafiltration and sodium profiles on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients: a randomized cross-over study

Variable

Ascending Descending Profile

No (%), Mean ± SD or Median (Min.Max.)

Routine

No (%), Mean ± SD or Median (Min.Max.)

P

Dialysis Duration (hr)

4.0 (3.0–5.0)

4.0 (3.0–5.0)

-

Dialysate temperature (°c)

36.50 (35.0–37.20)

36.50 (35.0–37.20)

-

Blood fow rate (ml/min)

300.0 (200.0–450.0)

300.0 (200.0–450.0)

-

Total UF (ml/session)

3227.4 ± 1355.6

3680.6 ± 933.5

-

Average UFR ( ml/kg/h)

10.25 (8.5–12)

11.25 (9.5–13)

-

Dry Weight (Kg)

67.6 ± 12.9

67.6 ± 12.9

-

Pre Dialysis Weight (Kg)

70.3 ± 13.2

70.8 ± 13.6

-

Post Dialysis Weight (Kg)

67.6 ± 12.9

67.9 ± 12.9

-

Sodium Levels Pre Dialysis (mEq/L)

136.1 ± 3.5

136.8 ± 3.9

Intragroup comparison in the routine group

**P < 0.001

Sodium Levels Post Dialysis (mEq/L)

140.3 ± 2.2

138.5 ± 2.2

Intragroup comparison of A/D profiles

**P < 0.001

IDWG

2.7 ± 1.3

3.1 ± 0.9

-

Heart Rate

74.7 ± 5.5

73.2 ± 5.9

-

Serum Albumin (g/dl)

3.9 ± 0.8

3.8 ± 0.3

-

Number of symptomatic intradialytic hypotension

18 (15%)

66(%55)

* P = 0.002

Concomitant treatment during dialysis for IDH

Midodrine

32 (27%)

34 (28%)

 

no concurrent treatment

88 (73%)

86 (72%)

 
  1. *Independent Samples T-Test ** Paired t test